<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sponsors the Obama Presidency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/google-sponsors-the-obama-presidency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/google-sponsors-the-obama-presidency/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:11:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcoronella</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/google-sponsors-the-obama-presidency/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=513#comment-130</guid>
		<description>They didn&#039;t have to use youtube here:

http://www.barackobama.com/tv/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They didn&#8217;t have to use youtube here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.barackobama.com/tv/" rel="nofollow">http://www.barackobama.com/tv/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/google-sponsors-the-obama-presidency/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=513#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t &quot;change&quot; a big part of the platform he ran on?  Change from getting away from being purchased by the corporations out there?  Doens&#039;t he have enough clout to create and post his messages on an unbranded site?

This is the president of the US and his videos certainly should not carry a brand on them.  At a minimum, the embedded versions on sites outside of YouTube should not carry the YouTube logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t &#8220;change&#8221; a big part of the platform he ran on?  Change from getting away from being purchased by the corporations out there?  Doens&#8217;t he have enough clout to create and post his messages on an unbranded site?</p>
<p>This is the president of the US and his videos certainly should not carry a brand on them.  At a minimum, the embedded versions on sites outside of YouTube should not carry the YouTube logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip John</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/google-sponsors-the-obama-presidency/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=513#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Does that also mean that Obama endorses Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, LinkedIn?

Does Obama endorse CBS because they were allowed to interview him?

In short, no. It means the Obama campaign/transition team use the tools and methods at their disposal for promotion.

By suggesting Obama simply offer out a video file, surely he should therefore use his own press release distribution service, his own servers to host his web site, his own version of twitter to engage tech-savvy voters.

I see you&#039;re using WordPress. Does that automatically mean you endorse WP? No, it doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that also mean that Obama endorses Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, LinkedIn?</p>
<p>Does Obama endorse CBS because they were allowed to interview him?</p>
<p>In short, no. It means the Obama campaign/transition team use the tools and methods at their disposal for promotion.</p>
<p>By suggesting Obama simply offer out a video file, surely he should therefore use his own press release distribution service, his own servers to host his web site, his own version of twitter to engage tech-savvy voters.</p>
<p>I see you&#8217;re using WordPress. Does that automatically mean you endorse WP? No, it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcoronella</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/google-sponsors-the-obama-presidency/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=513#comment-123</guid>
		<description>If Obama&#039;s team is savvy enough to have a twitter bot, they are certainly capable of uploading a mp4 to their website.   Leave it up to the video sites or users to put it on their site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Obama&#8217;s team is savvy enough to have a twitter bot, they are certainly capable of uploading a mp4 to their website.   Leave it up to the video sites or users to put it on their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Bollack</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/google-sponsors-the-obama-presidency/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Bollack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=513#comment-122</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re forgetting average Joe-Six Pack, who has no idea how to play a 17GB .vob file. You don&#039;t HAVE to get your news from YouTube, just like you don&#039;t really need Opie &amp; Anthony to hear a fart joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re forgetting average Joe-Six Pack, who has no idea how to play a 17GB .vob file. You don&#8217;t HAVE to get your news from YouTube, just like you don&#8217;t really need Opie &amp; Anthony to hear a fart joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcoronella</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/google-sponsors-the-obama-presidency/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=513#comment-121</guid>
		<description>No, I&#039;d prefer the raw video, or video in a non-branded player.

And while we&#039;re add it we can have the next election on PollDaddy -- we won&#039;t need all those pesky ballots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I&#8217;d prefer the raw video, or video in a non-branded player.</p>
<p>And while we&#8217;re add it we can have the next election on PollDaddy &#8212; we won&#8217;t need all those pesky ballots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Bollack</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/google-sponsors-the-obama-presidency/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Bollack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=513#comment-120</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d prefer multiple platforms? So he throws video on collegehumor, homestarrunner and the Onion: people around the world (including millions of Big-A americans [sic] ) still watch it on YouTube. Pick a broader-reaching, existing channel. Now Obama won&#039;t need a webmaster at all, mediocre or otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d prefer multiple platforms? So he throws video on collegehumor, homestarrunner and the Onion: people around the world (including millions of Big-A americans [sic] ) still watch it on YouTube. Pick a broader-reaching, existing channel. Now Obama won&#8217;t need a webmaster at all, mediocre or otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
