<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OnlineMarketer.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Wordpress iPhone App</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/wordpress-iphone-app-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/wordpress-iphone-app-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/wordpress-iphone-app/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Testing the wordpress iPhone app.  Really nice.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/p-2048-1536-f322cace-d330-4175-b90f-20dc53d555c9.jpeg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-364" src="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/p-2048-1536-f322cace-d330-4175-b90f-20dc53d555c9.jpeg" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not perfect, but still a nice effort.  <a href="http://iphone.wordpress.org/">Wordpress 2 for iPhone</a></p>
<p>This post originated at the <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/>Online Marketer</a> blog, home to <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/marketing-consultant/>marketing consultant</a> John Coronella.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/wordpress-iphone-app-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>.Com .Net and All the Rest</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/dot-com-dot-net-and-all-the-res/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/dot-com-dot-net-and-all-the-res/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Domain Names]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-974" title="SnapNames' auction interface highlights .COM and .NET domains" src="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/picture-9.png" alt="SnapNames' auction interface highlights .COM and .NET domains" width="413" height="255" /></p>
<p>I just noticed that the default search options for the domain auction for <a href="http://www.domainfest.com/">DomainFest</a> were .COM, .NET and Other.  It seems that  <a href="http://www.snapnames.com/">SnapNames</a> thinks most domain buyers will have a preference for either .COM or .NET above all others.</p>
<p>Is this an indication that .NET&#8217;s are becoming a viable alternative to .COM&#8217;s?</p>
<p>I think so.</p>
<p>This post originated at the <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/>Online Marketer</a> blog, home to <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/marketing-consultant/>marketing consultant</a> John Coronella.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/dot-com-dot-net-and-all-the-res/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Is Failure?   Google not Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/who-is-failure-google-not-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/who-is-failure-google-not-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Foo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It seems that someone has Tea-bagged Obama and made his page rank in google for &#8220;Who is Failure&#8221;.  This type of thing is easy to do: make a page rank for an otherwise uncompetitive term, but in this case it&#8217;s followed by an onslought of publicity that is an embarrasment to both the target and to Google.</p>
<p>I suspect that Google will manually take this down soon.  They say they can only rearrange search result pages (SERPS) algorithmically, but we all know that they may consider  <em>if (page = &#8216;obama&#8217;) { rank = 0 }</em> an algorithm.</p>
<p>More on this by <a href="http://searchengineland.com/obama-tops-for-who-is-failure-in-google-29788">Danny</a></p>
<p>This post originated at the <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/>Online Marketer</a> blog, home to <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/marketing-consultant/>marketing consultant</a> John Coronella.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/who-is-failure-google-not-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acquisio Logo</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/logo-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/logo-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Logos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-959" title="Acquisio eMail" src="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/picture-10-300x76.png" alt="Acquisio eMail" width="300" height="76" /></p>
<p>Does anyone else read this as: Acquisio <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if">if and only if</a> Newsletter?</p>
<p>I did.</p>
<p>This post originated at the <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/>Online Marketer</a> blog, home to <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/marketing-consultant/>marketing consultant</a> John Coronella.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/logo-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MySQL Bar Chart from the Command Line</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/mysql-bar-chart-from-the-command-line/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/mysql-bar-chart-from-the-command-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Foo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_946" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 210px"><img src="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/picture-8-150x150.png" alt="MySQL Command Line Bar Chart" title="MySQL ASCII Bar Chart" width="150" height="150" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-946" /><p class="wp-caption-text">MySQL Command Line Bar Chart</p></div><br />
<br />
I just ran accross this really cool method of generating a bar chart from the mysql command line using the mysql repeat command:</p>
<p><br style="clear:left;"/></p>
<p><code><br />
mysql> select date_format( create_time, '%Y-%m-%d') dt, repeat( '#', count(id)/20.0+1) dt  from result group by dt;</code></p>
<p>Comand line stats are addictive.  Nothing like real time&#8230; enjoy.   Thanks to <a href="http://snipplr.com/view/3934/generate-simple-bar-charts-from-a-mysql-prompt/">snipplr</a>.</p>
<p>This post originated at the <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/>Online Marketer</a> blog, home to <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/marketing-consultant/>marketing consultant</a> John Coronella.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/mysql-bar-chart-from-the-command-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle Buys MySQL and No One Notices</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/oracle-buys-mysql-and-no-one-notices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/oracle-buys-mysql-and-no-one-notices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Foo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_939" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><img src="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/oracle-150x150.png" alt="Oracle Boards Sun and Takes MySQL Captive" title="Oracle Boards Sun and Takes MySQL Captive" width="150" height="150" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-939" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Oracle Boards Sun and Takes MySQL Captive</p></div>
<p>I&#8217;m a little amazed that no-one seems to care that <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/">Oracle has bought MySQL</a> through it&#8217;s purchase of Sun announced today.   MySQL is used by over 40% of developers, and is one of the key backend databases for many of the sites you know and love. </p>
<p>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124022726514434703.html">WSJ</a> didn&#8217;t mention it.  Nor did <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/20/technology/Oracle_Sun/?postversion=2009042008">CNN</a>.  <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=awfGnLxcC8bk&#038;refer=home">Bloomberg</a>?  Nope.   <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2009/04/20/afx6310094.html">Forbes</a>?  of course not.   The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/technology/companies/21sun.html?ref=technology">NYT</a> at least mentioned it at the bottom.</p>
<p>Although Oracle won&#8217;t own the open source version, they pretty much control the main development path.   How would you feel if Microsoft was the lead for the Linux development?  I thought so.   </p>
<p>This post originated at the <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/>Online Marketer</a> blog, home to <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/marketing-consultant/>marketing consultant</a> John Coronella.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/oracle-buys-mysql-and-no-one-notices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web 2.0 Summit 2009 aka EliteCon</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/web-20-summit-2009-aka-elitecon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/web-20-summit-2009-aka-elitecon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Venture Capital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on the fence about <a href="http://en.oreilly.com/web2008/public/content/home">Web 2.0 Summit</a> in October 2009.  It&#8217;s an &#8216;invitation only&#8217; conference that is also &#8216;fat wallet only&#8217; at a whopping $4400 to attend.  It really is the best networking show in the industry, with few other opportunities existing to meet and talk to the internet&#8217;s most influential, not to mention several of the world&#8217;s Billionaires and lots of members of the 9 figure club. </p>
<p>I registered and paid for the 2008 show, but didn&#8217;t get to attend due to the birth of my daughter.  The 2007 show was killer, however.  Like most conferences, it&#8217;s not about the talks, but all of the talks for 2008 are posted below. </p>
<h2>Web 2.0 Summit 2008</h2>
<p><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/AwGFmUw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="412" height="340" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;m going to bother this year. Seems irresponsible to drop that kind of cash.   What do you think?</p>
<p>This post originated at the <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/>Online Marketer</a> blog, home to <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/marketing-consultant/>marketing consultant</a> John Coronella.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/web-20-summit-2009-aka-elitecon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time-Delay Cloaking:  Fighting Banner Blindness</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/time-delay-cloaking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/time-delay-cloaking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cloaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned <a href="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/scroll-cloaking/">scroll cloaking</a> a while back, and wanted to add another of my favorites: Time-Delay Cloaking.</p>
<p>With the time-delay cloaking method, a webmaster will partially render the page so that the ads at the top of the page show by themselves to users long enough to get a click and not get distracted by content.  Lets face it, a page with nothing but ads on it has fantastic CTR without all that pesky content getting in the way.<br />
<!--more--><br />
Time-Delay cloaking isn&#8217;t actually &#8216;cloaking&#8217; and webmasters have plausible deniability that it&#8217;s just a wonky server, or a slow connection, or perhaps just how the script hits a slow database.  Eventually the content loads, and no one is hurt.</p>
<h2>Big Benefits</h2>
<p>A delay of 6-10 seconds can double an advertisement&#8217;s CTR&#8230; or more.   The actual improvement, of course, depends upon a lot of things.   Just a few seconds of delay can have a measurable affect on click throughs.   When the advertisement is Adsense or another remotely hosted <a href="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/category/ad-networks/">ad network</a>, the delay may be even longer so that the remote script has time to load and render.   Time-delay cloaking can go a long way to make sure that advertisers aren&#8217;t ignored while still giving users what they came for.</p>
<h2>Credit CNet</h2>
<p>I first noticed this type of cloaking back in 1998 on <a href="http://www.cnet.com/">CNET</a>.  At the time, I think it was unintentional, but perhaps I don&#8217;t give them enough credit.  Their implementation involved a flaw in browsers at the time that would wait to render parts of a table until all the content loaded.  They would put their ads at the top of the page in a separate table, and it would render as soon as you hit the page.  The rest of the page would follow a few seconds later or more, depending on your connection speed.</p>
<h2>Implementation</h2>
<p>Implementation is fairly straightforward.  In PHP the simple implementation:<br />
<code><br />
&lt;?<br />
echo $yourHeader;<br />
echo $yourAd;</code></p>
<p>sleep( 5+rand(4,8)  );</p>
<p>echo $restOfYourPage;<br />
?&gt;<br />
<small>** you may or may not have to flush the output buffer.</small></p>
<p>In some cases, you could also put a slow loading remote script with a document.write().  There are many more ways to implement this, and I encourage you to be creative and let us know what you come up with.</p>
<h2>Some Tips</h2>
<p>Make sure you remove the delay for any bots as this can reduce your crawling rate, or worse.  I&#8217;m not sure how the search engines may see this, but that alone is a sure sign that you should proceed with caution.   Some tips for using this method:</p>
<p>- Randomize the delay time so it&#8217;s not obvious what you are doing<br />
- Don&#8217;t delay for bots - you may get reduced crawling or worse<br />
- Don&#8217;t over do it - if you delay too long, do you really have content?<br />
- Only delay once per user per day to avoid reverse engineers</p>
<h2>Disclaimer</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/category/cloaking/">Cloaking</a> of any kind may risk your search engine rankings.   I don’t endorse this technique, nor do I recommend it to anyone that hasn’t evaluated the risks. In general a site should cater to what is good for their users.  When in doubt, ask for help.</p>
<p>Happy Cloaking.</p>
<p>This post originated at the <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/>Online Marketer</a> blog, home to <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/marketing-consultant/>marketing consultant</a> John Coronella.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/time-delay-cloaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Downside of Using Wordpress</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/the-downside-of-using-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/the-downside-of-using-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graywolf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Blog Software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Wordpress is one of the more common and popular blogging platforms used today, Programmers, marketers and bloggers in general, love its simplicity to use, myriad of powerful plugins, and open source programming. However as many people are discovering, there are some downsides to using wordpress, and it&#8217;s not the right platform for every job or client.<!--more--></p>
<h2>Security</h2>
<p>Security, or more correctly the lack of security, is probably wordpresses biggest downside. Because it&#8217;s so widely used and open source it&#8217;s a natural target for hackers. There are plugins that help you <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/login-lockdown/">lockdown wordpress</a> a <a href="http://www.seoegghead.com/software/wordpress-firewall.seo">wordpress firewall plugin</a> and ways keep an <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/audit-trail/">audit trail</a> to help keep track of changes and even ways to<a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/three-tips-to-protect-your-wordpress-installation/"> limit access to your admin panel by IP</a>, but at the end of the day, from a security standpoint wordpress is a block of swiss cheese. So you should always make sure you <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-db-backup/">have backups</a> and keep your wordpress and plugins up to date.</p>
<h2>Maintenance</h2>
<p>Over the past year wordpress has dramatically increased the frequency and complexity of their new releases. In 2008 wordpress moved from wordpress 2.3 to 2.7, with more than one update requiring major changes to database schema. For organizations who are interested in doing business and not being a system admin for the ever changing world of wordpress, all of time maintaing a wordpress CMS, can make it look fairly unatractive. Normal maintenance combined with the required due dillegence for security can and will probably eat up a few man hours every month. If you are responsible for more than one blog the time commitment grows geometrically, often to the point of absurdity. Once you&#8217;ve commited to the wordpress platform it&#8217;s like getting a tattoo, getting rid of it is going to cost a bit of money, and be very painful. Ignore the maintenance aspect of wordpress and the weak security will come back to haunt you. It won&#8217;t be a matter of if your blog gets hacked, it will be just a matter of when.</p>
<h2>Lack of Enterprise Features</h2>
<p>Earlier this year Wired Magazine published an article saying <a href="http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/magazine/16-11/st_essay">blogging was dead</a>. While this was probably a well executed piece of linkbait (which worked), one thing the article was right about, personal, and single author blogs are dying out, and being replaced by bigger multi-author blogs. These new blogs bear more resemblance to magazines and newspapers than than to blogs in the classical sense. Wordpress has been slow to incorporate and enhance some of the key features enterprise publishers look for and need in a CMS. For example you can schedule posts for future publications with wordpress, but the most recent version removed this information from the dashboard. The post administration screen now shows &#8220;post publishes in 9 days&#8221; instead of the actual time and date of publication, which is a pretty serious oversight. Other features include a lack of native advertising management, instead relying on plugins, and the absence of built in template editor. IMHO features like this keep wordpress from being given serious consideration by mainstream publishers.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;ve painted a pretty grim picture, there is a lot to like about wordpress. You can&#8217;t beat the price, and if you invest the time, it can be an amazingly powerful piece of software. But choosing wordpress for your site, or your clients sites, is something you should give serious consideration too. Locking someone into a piece of software that requires a significant time investment for upkeep, isn&#8217;t for everyone, especially if there isn&#8217;t someone who is technologically savvy with time to devote to the upkeep. Think of wordpress as finicky european sports car, it may spend a lot of time in the shop, but when it&#8217;s out on the road, cornering like it&#8217;s on rails, it&#8217;s hard not enjoy it. If you do decide to move to wordpress <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_helping_bloggers_with_d.php">Google recently released some tools</a> to make the migration easier.</p>
<h3>About the Author</h3>
<p>With over 10 years experience in internet marketing and website development, Michael Gray has helped many companies with their SEO, ecommerce and website marketing needs. Michael has been a long time speaker at industry events such as PubCon, Search Engine Strategies and SMX. You can read his blog at <a href="http://www.wolf-howl.com">www.wolf-howl.com</a>, or his articles in many industry publications. In addition to internal search engine optimization, Michael also helps companies with their product campaigns with <a href="http://www.ViralConversations.com">ViralConversations.com</a></p>
<p>This post originated at the <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/>Online Marketer</a> blog, home to <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/marketing-consultant/>marketing consultant</a> John Coronella.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/the-downside-of-using-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Affiliate Summit West 2009 in Vegas</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/affiliate-summit-west-2009-vegas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/affiliate-summit-west-2009-vegas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_868" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.affiliatesummit.com/"><img src="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/bestlogo-150x150.png" alt="Affiliate Summit West 2009" title="bestlogo" width="150" height="150" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-868" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Affiliate Summit West 2009</p></div>
<p>For anyone wondering, I&#8217;ll be heading to <a href=http://www.affiliatesummit.com/>Affiliate Summit West</a> in Vegas from 1/10-1/12.  Last year&#8217;s Vegas show was great, and I&#8217;m looking forward to it once again.</p>
<p>The show is at the <a href=http://www.riolasvegas.com/>Rio</a>, but I&#8217;ll be kicking it at Steve Wynn&#8217;s new hotel, <a href=http://www.encorelasvegas.com/>Encore</a>.   I&#8217;m excited to see the new hotel since the <a href=http://www.wynnlasvegas.com/>Wynn</a> has been my favorite Vegas hotel so far.</p>
<p>See you there?</p>
<p>This post originated at the <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/>Online Marketer</a> blog, home to <a href=http://www.onlinemarketer.com/marketing-consultant/>marketing consultant</a> John Coronella.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/affiliate-summit-west-2009-vegas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
