<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for OnlineMarketer.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinemarketer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:11:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on .Com .Net and All the Rest by Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/dot-com-dot-net-and-all-the-res/comment-page-1/#comment-1585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=973#comment-1585</guid>
		<description>I would say that .net and .orgs are about equal. .coms remain #1 and the rest aren&#039;t widely recognized as of yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that .net and .orgs are about equal. .coms remain #1 and the rest aren&#8217;t widely recognized as of yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on .Com .Net and All the Rest by jcoronella</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/dot-com-dot-net-and-all-the-res/comment-page-1/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>jcoronella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=973#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>Outrageous asking prices abound no matter what TLD, for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outrageous asking prices abound no matter what TLD, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on .Com .Net and All the Rest by Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/dot-com-dot-net-and-all-the-res/comment-page-1/#comment-1577</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=973#comment-1577</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed attitudes changing amongst domainers... at least when they&#039;re selling dot NET domains.

Had some eyewatering prices quoted at me for domains I really wouldn&#039;t expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed attitudes changing amongst domainers&#8230; at least when they&#8217;re selling dot NET domains.</p>
<p>Had some eyewatering prices quoted at me for domains I really wouldn&#8217;t expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Acquisio Logo by Marc Poirier</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/logo-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Poirier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=953#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>Yup... I do :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup&#8230; I do :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Downside of Using WordPress by Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/the-downside-of-using-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-1344</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=872#comment-1344</guid>
		<description>Typically, when a WordPress update come out, I wait a few days before making the change. That way, if there is a problem with the latest update, I don&#039;t have to go back in again and make a change. 

Still, I like WP and find the updates to be a snap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typically, when a WordPress update come out, I wait a few days before making the change. That way, if there is a problem with the latest update, I don&#8217;t have to go back in again and make a change. </p>
<p>Still, I like WP and find the updates to be a snap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time-Delay Cloaking:  Fighting Banner Blindness by Benj Arriola</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/time-delay-cloaking/comment-page-1/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Benj Arriola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=887#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>Hmmm very true, it is not really cloaking. And what is to look at when there is nothing else to look at but ads. Somehow, it works like a pre-roll video ad. And since it is loading time, you can pretend it is caused by loading. And has no option to skip. *lol*

I am not sure if I am happy or annoyed with this. But I think it is really creative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm very true, it is not really cloaking. And what is to look at when there is nothing else to look at but ads. Somehow, it works like a pre-roll video ad. And since it is loading time, you can pretend it is caused by loading. And has no option to skip. *lol*</p>
<p>I am not sure if I am happy or annoyed with this. But I think it is really creative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Downside of Using WordPress by Eric Sornoso</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/the-downside-of-using-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Sornoso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=872#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>I use WordPress, and I do admit that I&#039;ve spending hours, and hours on making my site more efficient thru SEO, appearance, links, etc.. . I search the internet like an old John Wayne movie for the newest plug-in widgets, tricks, or blogging techniques. Within the endless amount of hours; I&#039;m very content, because within I gain a great deal of knowledge which sounds very cliche is priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use WordPress, and I do admit that I&#8217;ve spending hours, and hours on making my site more efficient thru SEO, appearance, links, etc.. . I search the internet like an old John Wayne movie for the newest plug-in widgets, tricks, or blogging techniques. Within the endless amount of hours; I&#8217;m very content, because within I gain a great deal of knowledge which sounds very cliche is priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Downside of Using WordPress by zacheos</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/the-downside-of-using-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>zacheos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=872#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>Could not possibly disagree more. You said,  &quot;features like this keep wordpress from being given serious consideration by mainstream publishers.&quot; Then why would CNN (just one of many, many, good examples) use WordPress heavily in their own webspace?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could not possibly disagree more. You said,  &#8220;features like this keep wordpress from being given serious consideration by mainstream publishers.&#8221; Then why would CNN (just one of many, many, good examples) use WordPress heavily in their own webspace?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Downside of Using WordPress by Hendry Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/the-downside-of-using-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendry Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=872#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>I have a different point of view though:

1. Security is tricky. As a piece of software becomes popular, it seems to have more security vulnerabilities because more people try to exploit it. I think this is certainly the case with WordPress. 

I have an article comparing WordPress, Drupal and Joomla security vulnerabilities over the years.

http://blogbuildingu.com/wordpress/wordpress-security

Whichever platform you use, it is necessary to update regularly for security reason.

2. Based on my experience with Drupal and WordPress, I can say that WP is the easiest to upgrade. It takes a few minutes at most.

I was worried about WP ugrade to 2.7 last year, but after hours of testing, it seems like there&#039;s no real problem at all during the process, at least for my installation.

ProBlogger.net featured my WP 2.7 upgrade article and it helped a lot of people during the transition to the new version of WP.

http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/12/28/how-to-upgrade-to-wordpress-27-safely-and-ensure-compatibility

With control always come responsibility. You can use Blogger.com and have them upgrade the code for you, but they are less powerful.

3. I agree. WordPress does lack of enterprise features but remember that it has already been around for a few years.

But for the need of support, which often is required by corporates, there are always Automattic and other companies who offer that kind of services.

It&#039;s a matter of looking for the right tool to build your site. For me, 8 out of 10 times I recommend WordPress, for the rest I consider Drupal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a different point of view though:</p>
<p>1. Security is tricky. As a piece of software becomes popular, it seems to have more security vulnerabilities because more people try to exploit it. I think this is certainly the case with WordPress. </p>
<p>I have an article comparing WordPress, Drupal and Joomla security vulnerabilities over the years.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogbuildingu.com/wordpress/wordpress-security" rel="nofollow">http://blogbuildingu.com/wordpress/wordpress-security</a></p>
<p>Whichever platform you use, it is necessary to update regularly for security reason.</p>
<p>2. Based on my experience with Drupal and WordPress, I can say that WP is the easiest to upgrade. It takes a few minutes at most.</p>
<p>I was worried about WP ugrade to 2.7 last year, but after hours of testing, it seems like there&#8217;s no real problem at all during the process, at least for my installation.</p>
<p>ProBlogger.net featured my WP 2.7 upgrade article and it helped a lot of people during the transition to the new version of WP.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/12/28/how-to-upgrade-to-wordpress-27-safely-and-ensure-compatibility" rel="nofollow">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/12/28/how-to-upgrade-to-wordpress-27-safely-and-ensure-compatibility</a></p>
<p>With control always come responsibility. You can use Blogger.com and have them upgrade the code for you, but they are less powerful.</p>
<p>3. I agree. WordPress does lack of enterprise features but remember that it has already been around for a few years.</p>
<p>But for the need of support, which often is required by corporates, there are always Automattic and other companies who offer that kind of services.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a matter of looking for the right tool to build your site. For me, 8 out of 10 times I recommend WordPress, for the rest I consider Drupal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Downside of Using WordPress by schikowski</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketer.com/the-downside-of-using-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>schikowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketer.com/?p=872#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>@seobro, you can add .html in permalinks, like this: %postname%.html
It works beautifully.
Regarding Google preferring one over the other, you might want to read this: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@seobro, you can add .html in permalinks, like this: %postname%.html<br />
It works beautifully.<br />
Regarding Google preferring one over the other, you might want to read this: <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
